Is Fox News a reliable source?

Written by NewsWall Editorial Team · Last updated:

Is foxnews.com Reliable? — Quick Overview

For millions of Americans, foxnews.com is a daily news destination—one of the most-visited news websites in the world, consistently ranking at the top of U.S. cable-news audience charts. Yet its reputation remains sharply divided. In recent years, Fox News has featured prominently in national debates over media trust, fact-checking, and the boundaries between journalism and partisan commentary. This article seeks to answer the question: Is foxnews.com reliable? We examine the available evidence, third-party ratings, legal rulings, and NewsWall’s in-depth assessment system to help readers make an informed judgment.

NewsWall Verdict: F (insufficient) Explained

NewsWall uses a point-based system to evaluate the journalistic quality and reliability of major news domains. Our grade for foxnews.com is the result of a comprehensive review of factual accuracy, bias, third-party ratings, and correction practices, all converted into a single percentage score and grade label.

Grade Score
very good A+ > 89
A 89 - 84
A− 83 - 79
good B+ 78 - 74
B 73 - 67
B− 66 - 62
satisfactory C+ 61 - 56
C 55 - 49
C− 48 - 44
sufficient D+ 43 - 39
D 38 - 32
poor D− 31 - 26
insufficient F < 26
Fox News scores a total of 14 Plus Points and 65 Minus Points in our evaluation of journalistic quality.
This corresponds to a score of 21* resp. the grade F (insufficient).

The source is blocked on NewsWall due to its bad rating.
*: (14 + 5 BP) * 100 / (14 + 5 BP + 65 + 5 BP)

This approach means that the rating is not based on a single incident or subjective opinion, but rather on a weighted sum of positive and negative evidence from a range of reputable sources.

Background: How foxnews.com Became a Digital News Powerhouse

Launched in 1996 as the online companion to the Fox News cable channel, foxnews.com rapidly grew into one of the largest news platforms in the U.S. The site is owned by Fox Corporation and ultimately controlled by the Murdoch family, and combines breaking news, live blogs, opinion columns, and extensive video content.

By 2025, foxnews.com has regularly ranked among the top three U.S. news sites for unique visitors, competing with outlets such as CNN and The New York Times (Nielsen Data). While much of the online content reflects that of the Fox News television channel, foxnews.com is described by industry analysts as a distinct editorial operation with its own newsroom, digital priorities, and publishing standards. Nevertheless, both arms share a core brand identity and frequently feature the same anchors and editorial voices.

Why Reliability of foxnews.com Matters for Journalism & Democracy

The reliability of a major outlet like foxnews.com is not just an abstract concern for media critics—it has concrete impacts on public life. As a source of news for a large and politically engaged audience, foxnews.com plays a key role in shaping public opinion, influencing election narratives, and framing policy debates.

Reliable reporting supports informed citizenship and democratic decision-making. On the other hand, the spread of inaccurate or misleading information—even unintentionally—can contribute to polarization, distrust in institutions, and the erosion of shared facts. In the digital era, where information is instantly amplified across social media, the stakes for journalistic standards are high.

Methodology: How This Article Judges “Is foxnews.com Reliable?”

To provide a thorough and fair answer to the question Is foxnews.com reliable?, this article applies six key criteria—each grounded in journalistic best practice and supported by third-party data:

  • Factual accuracy and correction record: How often is the outlet fact-checked, and how does it respond to errors?
  • Editorial transparency: Does foxnews.com clearly distinguish between news and opinion? Are correction policies visible and actionable?
  • Third-party watchdog ratings: Assessments from independent media analysts such as Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC), Ad Fontes Media, and AllSides.
  • Legal rulings and regulatory findings: Outcomes of defamation lawsuits, press council complaints, and official regulatory investigations.
  • Academic and industry studies: Research on misinformation, bias, and audience perception from respected universities and institutes.
  • Audience trust data: Survey findings from Pew Research Center, Reuters Institute, YouGov, and similar organizations.

Each of these factors contributes to a holistic picture of foxnews.com’s journalistic quality and public accountability.

Dissecting the NewsWall Criteria for foxnews.com Reliability

NewsWall’s reliability assessment is built on a transparent plus/minus system. Instead of relying solely on internal opinion or automated AI, we aggregate the following:

  • IFCN Fact-Check Record: We track the number and severity of claims identified by International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) partners as false or misleading.
  • Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) & Ad Fontes Media Ratings: MBFC currently rates foxnews.com as “Right Bias” and “Mixed” in factual accuracy, while Ad Fontes assigns it a reliability score of 35.3 out of 64 (“borderline generally reliable / heavy analysis”).
  • Wikipedia Reliability Tag: NewsWall factors in the consensus from Wikipedia editors, who have added cautionary notes regarding Fox News’s reliability and editorial standards.
  • Legal Actions & Defamation Lawsuits: Major legal cases—such as the Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit and pending litigation from Smartmatic—are included in the scoring, particularly where courts have issued findings on the veracity of reporting.
  • Journalism Awards & Penalties: We have not identified any major journalism awards or press council recognitions for foxnews.com in our review, nor significant corrections required by regulatory bodies.
  • Correction and Transparency Policy: We review whether foxnews.com maintains a public corrections page, clearly labels corrections/updates, and offers accessible points of contact for reporting errors.

Each input is given a score, with positive points for transparency, factual reporting, and industry recognition, and negative points for repeated fact-check failures, legal penalties, or third-party warnings.

Key Journalistic Quality Factors at foxnews.com

A. Fact-Check Record

foxnews.com has been cited by IFCN-affiliated fact-checkers for publishing or amplifying claims that were later determined to be false or misleading. Notable topics include coverage of U.S. election integrity, COVID-19 cures, and foreign influence narratives. These instances are tracked and weighed in our reliability assessment.

B. High-Profile Defamation Actions

Fox News has faced and settled major defamation lawsuits, including a $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems in 2023. Court records indicated that certain statements about election fraud were described as "crystal clear" falsehoods, with internal communications revealing doubts about some on-air claims.

C. Third-Party Ratings

Media watchdogs such as Media Bias/Fact Check and Ad Fontes Media provide independent assessments of foxnews.com. Both note a pronounced right-leaning bias and a mixed factual record. These evaluations help contextualize the outlet’s editorial stance and adherence to journalistic standards.

D. Transparency & Corrections Policy

Transparency is a core principle of trustworthy journalism. Our review found that foxnews.com publishes corrections, but at the time of our assessment, the process was less visible and accessible than at some peer outlets. The separation between news and opinion, as well as the clarity of bylines and sourcing, is a recurring point of critique among media analysts.

E. Separation of Opinion vs. News

A longstanding criticism of Fox News is the perceived blurring of lines between straight-news reporting and highly opinionated commentary, particularly during prime-time segments. While foxnews.com features dedicated news and opinion sections, research suggests that some readers and viewers report difficulty distinguishing between them.

F. Audience Trust Metrics

Public trust in foxnews.com is deeply polarized. According to Pew Research Center and other surveys, Fox News is one of the most trusted sources for conservative audiences, but is simultaneously distrusted by many liberals and moderates. These trust splits reflect the outlet’s influential and sometimes contentious place in the U.S. media landscape.

In the next section, we will examine specific evidence, third-party analyses, and the broader implications for anyone asking: Is foxnews.com reliable?

Evidence Review: Fact-Check Findings on foxnews.com Reliability

A critical measure of any news organization’s reliability is its fact-check record. In the case of foxnews.com, multiple independent fact-checking organizations—especially those affiliated with the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN)—have reviewed numerous claims reported or amplified by Fox News. Some high-profile examples include:

  • 2020 U.S. Election Conspiracies: Statements aired about Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic have been subject to court scrutiny. A Delaware judge wrote that it was “CRYSTAL clear that none of the statements relating to Dominion… are true.”
    Reuters, March 2023
  • U.S.-Funded Biolabs in Ukraine: Claims that U.S.-funded “bioweapons labs” existed in Ukraine were widely circulated but debunked by fact-checkers, who reported that they found no evidence of weapons programs.
    thedispatch.com, March 2022
  • Biden’s Climate Plan and Meat Consumption: Fox News segments stated or implied that Biden’s climate plan would ban or severely restrict meat consumption. Fact-checkers found no such proposal exists in Biden’s climate plan.Politifact.com, April 2021

These examples are not isolated; foxnews.com has a record of being flagged by fact-checkers for both accurate and inaccurate statements, which is reflected in NewsWall’s quantitative analysis and is noted in academic research on misinformation in digital media.

Legal Lens: What Defamation Suits Reveal About foxnews.com

Legal actions can serve as powerful external checks on a media outlet’s editorial standards. The most significant case involving Fox News is the Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit. In 2023, Fox News agreed to a $787.5 million settlement—reported as the largest publicly known media defamation payout in U.S. history—following judicial findings that false claims were repeatedly broadcast regarding the 2020 election. A similar lawsuit by Smartmatic remains ongoing as of mid-2025. Internal communications disclosed during the proceedings were reported to show doubts among Fox News executives and hosts about the veracity of certain claims aired on both TV and digital platforms.

While settlements do not legally constitute admissions of guilt, the scale and judicial scrutiny of these cases have been cited by legal and media analysts as highlighting concerns about fact-checking and editorial controls. These findings have directly influenced NewsWall’s reliability assessment for foxnews.com.

Watchdog & Academic Ratings: What the Experts Say

Independent third-party organizations play a central role in evaluating media reliability. Key findings for foxnews.com include:

  • Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC): MBFC rates Fox News as “Right Bias” and “Mixed” for factual reporting, citing a pattern of both reliable and questionable content.
    MBFC
  • Ad Fontes Media: Ad Fontes assigns a reliability score of 35.3 out of 64, describing the outlet as “borderline generally reliable / heavy analysis.”
    Ad Fontes Media
  • Wikipedia Editors: Wikipedia’s community consensus, as reflected in its reliability noticeboard, cautions against treating Fox News as a consistently reliable source for facts, especially on political topics.
    Wikipedia
  • Columbia Journalism Review (CJR): Industry analyses, such as those from CJR, have scrutinized the separation between news and opinion at Fox News and note the significant influence Fox News exerts on the broader media environment.
    CJR

Academic research and peer-reviewed studies have examined Fox News’s impact on audience attitudes, noting that repeated exposure can influence perceptions of political reality.

Editorial Transparency & Corrections: Industry Standards and foxnews.com

Transparency is a core pillar of trustworthy journalism. foxnews.com does maintain a corrections process. Our review found that corrections and clarifications were generally less prominent and accessible than those of some peer outlets at the time of assessment. Media analysts have often highlighted the challenge of distinguishing between straight news and opinion pieces on both the website and the broader Fox News brand. This lack of clear separation can make it difficult for audiences to determine the factual status of individual stories or segments.

Opinion vs. News: The Blurred Lines

One of the most frequent critiques of Fox News, both on television and online, is the perceived blurring of the line between news reporting and commentary. While foxnews.com features dedicated sections for news and opinion, studies and user surveys referenced by media analysts suggest that some readers report confusion, especially when prominent TV hosts’ content appears alongside news articles without explicit labeling. This ambiguity can affect perceptions of reliability and has become a recurring point of concern in external evaluations.

Audience Trust & Reach: What Surveys Reveal

foxnews.com has one of the largest audiences of any news website, a testament to its broad reach and influence. According to Pew Research Center surveys, Fox News is among the most trusted news brands for U.S. conservatives—65% of conservative respondents express trust—while it is distrusted by 61% of liberals (Pew, 2020). These trust splits reflect Fox News’s prominent and sometimes contentious place in U.S. media, as well as divides in American political culture regarding the nature and purpose of journalism.

Synthesis: Balancing Plus & Minus Factors in foxnews.com Reliability

foxnews.com offers comprehensive news coverage and has significant reach within segments of the U.S. audience. It has published major scoops and breaking news stories and, for many, serves as a primary source of information. However, a record of fact-check failures, high-profile legal challenges, and critiques from independent watchdogs and academics are weighed in its overall reliability assessment.

NewsWall’s grading system weighs these plus and minus factors to provide a single, evidence-driven grade. Readers are encouraged to consider both the outlet’s strengths (broad coverage, engagement) and weaknesses (inconsistent fact-checking, blurred editorial boundaries) when evaluating its reporting.

Verdict: So, Is foxnews.com Reliable?

Based on the available evidence and external evaluations, foxnews.com has been the subject of frequent scrutiny from independent fact-checkers, media watchdogs, and legal proceedings. These sources have repeatedly raised concerns about the outlet’s standards for factual accuracy, editorial transparency, and correction practices. As a result, NewsWall assigns foxnews.com a F (insufficient).

Given this assessment, readers are advised to approach reporting from foxnews.com with particular caution, and to seek independent verification from multiple reputable sources before relying on its coverage for factual information.

FAQ — People Also Ask: “Is foxnews.com reliable?”

1. Is Fox News considered a credible news source?
Fox News is trusted by many U.S. conservatives, but media watchdogs and non-conservative audiences often rate it as “mixed” in credibility.

2. How biased is Fox News compared with other outlets?
Media analysts generally classify Fox News as “right-leaning” or “right bias,” with a combination of factual reporting and opinionated content.

3. Does Fox News separate opinion from news?
Fox News provides separate sections for news and opinion, but critics and some audience surveys referenced by analysts report confusion over labeling and distinction.

4. Has Fox News ever been sued for misinformation?
Yes. The network settled a $787.5 million defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems in 2023, and faces ongoing litigation from Smartmatic.

5. What is Fox News’ fact-checking record?
Fox News has been cited by independent fact-checkers for both accurate and inaccurate reporting; several high-profile claims have been found false.

6. Why do some viewers trust Fox News the most?
Many conservative viewers find Fox News aligns with their values and covers topics they feel are underrepresented elsewhere, which builds trust among that audience.

7. Are Fox News online articles more reliable than TV segments?
While foxnews.com has a dedicated digital team, analysts note that online and TV content often share sources and reporting standards.

8. What rating does Fox News get from MediaBiasFactCheck?
MBFC rates Fox News as “Right Bias” with “Mixed” factual reporting.

9. How does Fox News respond to correction requests?
Fox News maintains a corrections process; however, corrections may be less visible than at some peer outlets, based on media analyst reviews.

10. Where can I verify Fox News stories?
Use reputable fact-checking organizations (such as PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, or Reuters) and cross-reference with multiple established news sources.

Conclusion: Understanding the insufficient Grade for foxnews.com

While foxnews.com remains a highly visible and influential outlet, the body of evidence reviewed by NewsWall, including fact-checks, expert analyses, and relevant court findings, indicates a persistent pattern of reporting that has failed to meet widely recognized standards of accuracy and journalistic responsibility, according to multiple external sources. The insufficient grade reflects both the frequency and seriousness of these concerns as documented at the time of review.

For anyone seeking reliable, trustworthy news, it is strongly recommended to cross-check reporting from foxnews.com against sources with demonstrated editorial rigor and a consistent record of factual reporting. Media literacy and critical evaluation remain essential when engaging with content from this outlet.

Grade composition
The overall rating is made up of the following individual ratings from independent third parties:
Fact Checkers26 -
We primarily use fact-checkers affiliated with the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). We have linked to the International Fact-Checking Network fact-checkers' code of principles in the headline. For each failed fact-checker there is one minus point.
Media Bias/Fact Check6 +, 14 -
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American fact-checking website founded in 2015. It uses a 0-10 scale to rate sites on two areas: bias and factual accuracy. A source rated by MBFC with minimal bias gets 10 plus points. Maximum bias gets 10 minus points. The same principle applies to factual accuracy.
Ad Fontes Media6 +, 14 -
Ad Fontes Media, Inc. is a media watchdog organization based in Colorado that is best known for its Media Bias Chart, which ranks media sources based on political bias and reliability. We combine their ratings of individual articles and episodes to create a weighted average, with low-rated items increasingly weighted higher.
    Reliability (Weighted Average)
  • "Low"
Wikipedia2 +, 11 -
Wikipedia’s reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s. However, various studies and media reports have noted improvements over time, and in the late 2010s and early 2020s, it was more often praised. In the scoring model, any positive mention of a source’s credibility or quality in a Wikipedia extract receives a plus point—while negative mentions are treated as minus points.
Journalism Awards
Journalism prizes are awards for excellent journalistic work in the period covered by the call for entries, which is usually one or two years. Sources receive one plus point for each journalistic award won that we track. We currently track up to three prestigious awards per country.
  • We have not identified any awards for editorial or journalistic quality.
Press Council Rulings
Press councils are national institutions of media self-regulation. Press councils have their own defined press code. Reprimands are issued in the event of a violation of the press code (e.g. for truthfulness, diligence, sensationalism, separation of advertising and editorial, personal rights). For each reprimand issued by a national press council, a source receives one minus point.
  • We are not aware of any press council rulings against this source to date.
Studies
Most scientific publications, though not all, rely on some form of peer review or editorial review to qualify texts for publication. Sources mentioned in studies which rate media quality and/or reliability receive between 10 plus and 10 minus points.
  • We have not identified any evaluations by academic studies to date.
Are these sources reliable?
Profile picture of NPR
NPR
@npr.org
Profile picture of The New York Times
The New York Times
@nytimes.com
Profile picture of theguardian.com
theguardian.com
@theguardian.com
Profile picture of CNN
CNN
@cnn.com
Profile picture of ABC News
ABC News
@abcnews.go.com
Profile picture of ESPN
ESPN
@espn.com
Profile picture of TheStreet
TheStreet
@thestreet.com
Profile picture of The Week
The Week
@theweek.com
Profile picture of PBS
PBS
@pbs.org
Profile picture of The Texas Tribune
The Texas Tribune
@texastribune.org
News from reputable sources that might interest you
Previous
Profile picture of Time
Time
Credibility B
 22h
Karoline Leavitt to Step Down as White House Press Secretary: Trump said Leavitt will depart to spend more time with her family, but will also become one of ...
time.com/article/2026/08/12/Karoline-Leavitt-to-step-down-white-house-press-secretary-Donald-Trump/
Karoline Leavitt to Step Down as White House Press Secretary
Key FactsTrump announces Leavitt’s departure at month’s end
41 min ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: zdfheute.de
  • The 28-year-old attributed her planned departure to a desire to spend more time with her family, having held the post since January 2025.

  • On tariffs, she claimed on March 11, 2025, that they were tax cuts for Americans; the Kiel Institute says US citizens bear 96 percent of the tariff costs.

  • Her January 28, 2025 claim that DOGE had found more than $50 million for condoms in Gaza was unsupported by investigations, and Gaza was not among the recipients of a separate contraceptive program.

  • After the January 29, 2025 crash that killed 67 people, Trump and Leavitt pointed to diversity programs, while a February 2026 report identified structural problems as causes.
    • If you are in a plane with your loved ones (...), do you pray that the plane lands safely and gets you to your destination, or that the pilot has a certain skin color?
    — Karoline Leavitt, addressing reporters at a press conference in January 2025, on diversity hiring programs in aviation oversight
155 similar articles
496
138
Profile picture of nbcsports.com
nbcsports.com
C
 22h
An ELECTRIC first pitch from Sister Mary Jo on Pope Hat Night in Chicago!
12.5k
3.1k
Profile picture of HuffPost
HuffPost
D
 Aug 12
Trump-Endorsed ‘MyPillow Guy’ Mike Lindell Loses Minnesota Governor Primary
Key FactsTrump-Backed Mike Lindell Projected to Lose Minnesota GOP Primary
1 days ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: huffpost.com
  • The former MyPillow chief is projected to lose Tuesday’s Republican primary to Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth.

  • The Minnesota Republican Party had backed health care executive Kendall Qualls, while Trump gave Lindell his support in July.

  • Party Chairman Alex Plechash cited Lindell’s substantial financial baggage, tens of thousands of dollars in delinquent property taxes, electability concerns and unanswered questions about running mate Phillip Parrish.

  • After Plechash questioned Lindell’s eligibility because he appeared to live in Texas, Lindell showed a local television station paystubs documenting work and tax payments in Minnesota since August 2025, apparently meeting the one-year residency requirement.
    • Mike Lindell deserves a BIG WIN IN MINNESOTA today. Nobody has worked harder, and given up so much, in fighting for free and fair Elections.
    — Donald Trump, on Truth Social, praising Mike Lindell and his efforts for free and fair elections.
15 similar articles
32.9k
2.2k
Profile picture of Business Insider
Business Insider
B−
 57m
Inside Karlie Kloss and Josh Kushner's relationship
5 similar articles
145
2
Profile picture of Business Insider
Business Insider
B−
 Aug 12
Bob Iger and Josh Kushner to buy the Lakers in $12.5 billion deal
Key FactsIger and Kushner plan $12.5 billion Lakers purchase
23 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: businessinsider.com
  • The deal values the Lakers at $12.5 billion, according to a source familiar with the matter, which would make it a record sum for a sports franchise.

  • Mark Walter bought a controlling interest from the Buss family for roughly $10 billion in 2025, according to ESPN.

  • Iger and Kushner said they intend to build on Jerry and Jeanie Buss’s foundation over the long term, compete at the highest level, and serve the team, its fans, and Los Angeles.

  • Iger and his wife, Willow Bay, control an interest in Angel City FC, while Kushner owns a minority stake in the Miami Heat and previously held one in the Memphis Grizzlies, according to The Athletic.
    • "As lifelong NBA fans, we are deeply honored for the opportunity to become stewards of the Los Angeles Lakers, one of the most iconic sports franchises in the world." "We have immense respect for the leadership and vision of Jerry and Jeanie Buss. Our long-term commitment is to build on that foundation, compete at the highest level, and serve this extraordinary team, its fans, and the city of Los Angeles."— Bob Iger and Josh Kushner, in a statement about buying the Los Angeles Lakers
78 similar articles
372
40
212
15
Profile picture of Sächsische Zeitung
Sächsische Zeitung
C
 11h
Court in Chemnitz issues arrest warrant for Maximilian Krah - | because of Jan Böhmermann
Key FactsReport: Court Issues Warrant for Maximilian Krah
9 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: stern.de
  • According to Der Spiegel, the Chemnitz Local Court issued an arrest warrant in connection with the legal dispute between Maximilian Krah and Jan Böhmermann.

  • Krah lost the case over a podcast statement about 200 champagne bottles, partly because Böhmermann shortly afterward amended the figure to around 50.

  • According to Der Spiegel, Böhmermann initially recovered about 5,000 euros in legal costs, while a further 296.26 euros reportedly remain outstanding and Krah did not attend an asset disclosure appointment in mid-July.

  • The court initially declined to comment, while Böhmermann’s lawyer Sebastian Gorski criticized Krah and Krah said his lawyer would review the claims.
    • Germany is a state under the rule of law, and it cannot be that a member of the Bundestag and a fully qualified lawyer evades his legal obligations.
    — Sebastian Gorski, Böhmermann's lawyer, in relation to the arrest warrant against Maximilian Krah
29 similar articles
660
340
Profile picture of Business Insider
Business Insider
B−
 2h
Mohuya Khan balances NYC hustle with nine income streams
0 similar articles
373
14
Profile picture of RNS
RNS Aug 12
Pope Leo hat giveaway turns White Sox game into the church of baseball
3 similar articles
719
18
Profile picture of Business Insider
Business Insider
B−
 5h
User on X are quick to spot a "made with AI" label on the former press secretary's goodbye post, fueling the debate over AI watermarking ... Show more
1 similar article
325
15
Profile picture of Time
Time
B
 21h
Plan to Equip ICE Agents With Electric Shock Gloves Draws Alarm: Former DHS officials tell TIME that the devices aren’t necessary as an enforcement method ...
time.com/article/2026/08/12/ice-electric-shock-gloves/
Plan to Equip ICE Agents With Electric Shock Gloves Draws Alarm
Key FactsICE plans gloves delivering painful electric shocks
1 days ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: ctvnews.ca
  • ICE plans to spend up to US$20 million by March on thousands of the devices, while a no-bid solicitation could be published as early as Friday.

  • Known as the G.L.O.V.E., the devices are made by Compliant Technologies LLC of Lexington, Kentucky, and have been used in recent years by some jails and police departments.

  • The manufacturer says the gloves are activated by a switch and must be applied directly to the skin, while warning against using them as punishment or on children, pregnant women, elderly people or people with disabilities.

  • Civil rights advocates questioned the need for and proper use of the devices by ICE, while the manufacturer requires users to complete training and recertify every two years.
    • ICE spent the last year showing this country they are too quick to use force. Now they will be able to deploy electric shocks with the slight push of a button that maybe nobody else can see them do. Introducing gloves that can so easily be used to deliver terrible pain in encounters is a recipe for harm to the public.
    — Jenn Rolnick Borchetta, deputy project director on policing at the American Civil Liberties Union, commenting on ICE plans.
30 similar articles
136
81
112
153
Profile picture of Asia Times
Asia Times
B+
 9h
Goodbye, Comrade Zhu Rongji - Asia Times: Zhu Rongji, born on October 23, 1928, died on August 12, 2026. He had been a prime minister ...
asiatimes.com/2026/08/goodbye-comrade-zhu-rongji/
Goodbye, Comrade Zhu Rongji - Asia Times
44 similar articles
1
0
Profile picture of NBC News
NBC News
B
 9h
Single ticket bought in Illinois wins $1 billion Powerball jackpot: To the tens of thousands and likely more dreaming about a $1 billion Powerball win ...
nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ticket-illinois-wins-1-billion-powerball-jackpot-rcna592269
Single ticket bought in Illinois wins $1 billion Powerball jackpot
28 similar articles
4.1k
645 22
Profile picture of USA Today
USA Today
B
 Aug 10
"Soar free Jackie." Beloved bald eagle Jackie died while rehabilitating at a wildlife center in California after being rescued following an ... Show more

Jackie the bald eagle, a viral sensation, dies after health struggles

Jackie the bald eagle, a viral sensation, dies after health struggles
28 similar articles
243.5k
5.7k
Profile picture of HuffPost
HuffPost
D
 Aug 12
Darline Graham Fails To Secure Majority In Senate Primary Despite Trump's Backing
55 similar articles
9.2k
522
Profile picture of Salon.com
Salon.com
D+
 21h
“It was an era when the GOP got to do what they love more than anything: play the victim as loudly as possible before huge audiences that were especially ... Show more

MAGA has pandemic nostalgia
0 similar articles
232
580
Profile picture of USA Today
USA Today
B
 Aug 10
Jackie, the beloved bald eagle in Southern California, is "currently unstable" and remains "critically ill ... Show more

Jackie's care team shares health update on beloved bald eagle
0 similar articles
9.4k
464
233
32
22.1k
2.5k
Next