Is Fox News a reliable source?

Written by NewsWall Editorial Team · Last updated:

Is foxnews.com Reliable? — Quick Overview

For millions of Americans, foxnews.com is a daily news destination—one of the most-visited news websites in the world, consistently ranking at the top of U.S. cable-news audience charts. Yet its reputation remains sharply divided. In recent years, Fox News has featured prominently in national debates over media trust, fact-checking, and the boundaries between journalism and partisan commentary. This article seeks to answer the question: Is foxnews.com reliable? We examine the available evidence, third-party ratings, legal rulings, and NewsWall’s in-depth assessment system to help readers make an informed judgment.


NewsWall Verdict: F (insufficient) Explained

NewsWall uses a point-based system to evaluate the journalistic quality and reliability of major news domains. Our grade for foxnews.com is the result of a comprehensive review of factual accuracy, bias, third-party ratings, and correction practices, all converted into a single percentage score and grade label.

Grade Score
very good A+ > 89
A 89 - 84
A- 83 - 79
good B+ 78 - 74
B 73 - 67
B- 66 - 62
satisfactory C+ 61 - 56
C 55 - 49
C- 48 - 44
sufficient D+ 43 - 39
D 38 - 32
poor D- 31 - 26
insufficient F < 26
Fox News scores a total of 14 Plus Points and 65 Minus Points in our evaluation of journalistic quality.
This corresponds to a score of 21* resp. the grade F (insufficient).

The source is blocked on NewsWall due to its bad rating.
*: (14 + 5 BP) * 100 / (14 + 5 BP + 65 + 5 BP)

This approach means that the rating is not based on a single incident or subjective opinion, but rather on a weighted sum of positive and negative evidence from a range of reputable sources.


Background: How foxnews.com Became a Digital News Powerhouse

Launched in 1996 as the online companion to the Fox News cable channel, foxnews.com rapidly grew into one of the largest news platforms in the U.S. The site is owned by Fox Corporation and ultimately controlled by the Murdoch family, and combines breaking news, live blogs, opinion columns, and extensive video content.

By 2025, foxnews.com has regularly ranked among the top three U.S. news sites for unique visitors, competing with outlets such as CNN and The New York Times (Nielsen Data). While much of the online content reflects that of the Fox News television channel, foxnews.com is described by industry analysts as a distinct editorial operation with its own newsroom, digital priorities, and publishing standards. Nevertheless, both arms share a core brand identity and frequently feature the same anchors and editorial voices.


Why Reliability of foxnews.com Matters for Journalism & Democracy

The reliability of a major outlet like foxnews.com is not just an abstract concern for media critics—it has concrete impacts on public life. As a source of news for a large and politically engaged audience, foxnews.com plays a key role in shaping public opinion, influencing election narratives, and framing policy debates.

Reliable reporting supports informed citizenship and democratic decision-making. On the other hand, the spread of inaccurate or misleading information—even unintentionally—can contribute to polarization, distrust in institutions, and the erosion of shared facts. In the digital era, where information is instantly amplified across social media, the stakes for journalistic standards are high.


Methodology: How This Article Judges “Is foxnews.com Reliable?”

To provide a thorough and fair answer to the question Is foxnews.com reliable?, this article applies six key criteria—each grounded in journalistic best practice and supported by third-party data:

  • Factual accuracy and correction record: How often is the outlet fact-checked, and how does it respond to errors?
  • Editorial transparency: Does foxnews.com clearly distinguish between news and opinion? Are correction policies visible and actionable?
  • Third-party watchdog ratings: Assessments from independent media analysts such as Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC), Ad Fontes Media, and AllSides.
  • Legal rulings and regulatory findings: Outcomes of defamation lawsuits, press council complaints, and official regulatory investigations.
  • Academic and industry studies: Research on misinformation, bias, and audience perception from respected universities and institutes.
  • Audience trust data: Survey findings from Pew Research Center, Reuters Institute, YouGov, and similar organizations.

Each of these factors contributes to a holistic picture of foxnews.com’s journalistic quality and public accountability.


Dissecting the NewsWall Criteria for foxnews.com Reliability

NewsWall’s reliability assessment is built on a transparent plus/minus system. Instead of relying solely on internal opinion or automated AI, we aggregate the following:

  • IFCN Fact-Check Record: We track the number and severity of claims identified by International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) partners as false or misleading.
  • Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) & Ad Fontes Media Ratings: MBFC currently rates foxnews.com as “Right Bias” and “Mixed” in factual accuracy, while Ad Fontes assigns it a reliability score of 35.3 out of 64 (“borderline generally reliable / heavy analysis”).
  • Wikipedia Reliability Tag: NewsWall factors in the consensus from Wikipedia editors, who have added cautionary notes regarding Fox News’s reliability and editorial standards.
  • Legal Actions & Defamation Lawsuits: Major legal cases—such as the Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit and pending litigation from Smartmatic—are included in the scoring, particularly where courts have issued findings on the veracity of reporting.
  • Journalism Awards & Penalties: We have not identified any major journalism awards or press council recognitions for foxnews.com in our review, nor significant corrections required by regulatory bodies.
  • Correction and Transparency Policy: We review whether foxnews.com maintains a public corrections page, clearly labels corrections/updates, and offers accessible points of contact for reporting errors.

Each input is given a score, with positive points for transparency, factual reporting, and industry recognition, and negative points for repeated fact-check failures, legal penalties, or third-party warnings.


Key Journalistic Quality Factors at foxnews.com

A. Fact-Check Record

foxnews.com has been cited by IFCN-affiliated fact-checkers for publishing or amplifying claims that were later determined to be false or misleading. Notable topics include coverage of U.S. election integrity, COVID-19 cures, and foreign influence narratives. These instances are tracked and weighed in our reliability assessment.

B. High-Profile Defamation Actions

Fox News has faced and settled major defamation lawsuits, including a $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems in 2023. Court records indicated that certain statements about election fraud were described as "crystal clear" falsehoods, with internal communications revealing doubts about some on-air claims.

C. Third-Party Ratings

Media watchdogs such as Media Bias/Fact Check and Ad Fontes Media provide independent assessments of foxnews.com. Both note a pronounced right-leaning bias and a mixed factual record. These evaluations help contextualize the outlet’s editorial stance and adherence to journalistic standards.

D. Transparency & Corrections Policy

Transparency is a core principle of trustworthy journalism. Our review found that foxnews.com publishes corrections, but at the time of our assessment, the process was less visible and accessible than at some peer outlets. The separation between news and opinion, as well as the clarity of bylines and sourcing, is a recurring point of critique among media analysts.

E. Separation of Opinion vs. News

A longstanding criticism of Fox News is the perceived blurring of lines between straight-news reporting and highly opinionated commentary, particularly during prime-time segments. While foxnews.com features dedicated news and opinion sections, research suggests that some readers and viewers report difficulty distinguishing between them.

F. Audience Trust Metrics

Public trust in foxnews.com is deeply polarized. According to Pew Research Center and other surveys, Fox News is one of the most trusted sources for conservative audiences, but is simultaneously distrusted by many liberals and moderates. These trust splits reflect the outlet’s influential and sometimes contentious place in the U.S. media landscape.


In the next section, we will examine specific evidence, third-party analyses, and the broader implications for anyone asking: Is foxnews.com reliable?

Evidence Review: Fact-Check Findings on foxnews.com Reliability

A critical measure of any news organization’s reliability is its fact-check record. In the case of foxnews.com, multiple independent fact-checking organizations—especially those affiliated with the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN)—have reviewed numerous claims reported or amplified by Fox News. Some high-profile examples include:

  • 2020 U.S. Election Conspiracies: Statements aired about Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic have been subject to court scrutiny. A Delaware judge wrote that it was “CRYSTAL clear that none of the statements relating to Dominion… are true.”
    Reuters, March 2023
  • U.S.-Funded Biolabs in Ukraine: Claims that U.S.-funded “bioweapons labs” existed in Ukraine were widely circulated but debunked by fact-checkers, who reported that they found no evidence of weapons programs.
    thedispatch.com, March 2022
  • Biden’s Climate Plan and Meat Consumption: Fox News segments stated or implied that Biden’s climate plan would ban or severely restrict meat consumption. Fact-checkers found no such proposal exists in Biden’s climate plan.Politifact.com, April 2021

These examples are not isolated; foxnews.com has a record of being flagged by fact-checkers for both accurate and inaccurate statements, which is reflected in NewsWall’s quantitative analysis and is noted in academic research on misinformation in digital media.


Legal Lens: What Defamation Suits Reveal About foxnews.com

Legal actions can serve as powerful external checks on a media outlet’s editorial standards. The most significant case involving Fox News is the Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit. In 2023, Fox News agreed to a $787.5 million settlement—reported as the largest publicly known media defamation payout in U.S. history—following judicial findings that false claims were repeatedly broadcast regarding the 2020 election. A similar lawsuit by Smartmatic remains ongoing as of mid-2025. Internal communications disclosed during the proceedings were reported to show doubts among Fox News executives and hosts about the veracity of certain claims aired on both TV and digital platforms.

While settlements do not legally constitute admissions of guilt, the scale and judicial scrutiny of these cases have been cited by legal and media analysts as highlighting concerns about fact-checking and editorial controls. These findings have directly influenced NewsWall’s reliability assessment for foxnews.com.


Watchdog & Academic Ratings: What the Experts Say

Independent third-party organizations play a central role in evaluating media reliability. Key findings for foxnews.com include:

  • Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC): MBFC rates Fox News as “Right Bias” and “Mixed” for factual reporting, citing a pattern of both reliable and questionable content.
    MBFC
  • Ad Fontes Media: Ad Fontes assigns a reliability score of 35.3 out of 64, describing the outlet as “borderline generally reliable / heavy analysis.”
    Ad Fontes Media
  • Wikipedia Editors: Wikipedia’s community consensus, as reflected in its reliability noticeboard, cautions against treating Fox News as a consistently reliable source for facts, especially on political topics.
    Wikipedia
  • Columbia Journalism Review (CJR): Industry analyses, such as those from CJR, have scrutinized the separation between news and opinion at Fox News and note the significant influence Fox News exerts on the broader media environment.
    CJR

Academic research and peer-reviewed studies have examined Fox News’s impact on audience attitudes, noting that repeated exposure can influence perceptions of political reality.


Editorial Transparency & Corrections: Industry Standards and foxnews.com

Transparency is a core pillar of trustworthy journalism. foxnews.com does maintain a corrections process. Our review found that corrections and clarifications were generally less prominent and accessible than those of some peer outlets at the time of assessment. Media analysts have often highlighted the challenge of distinguishing between straight news and opinion pieces on both the website and the broader Fox News brand. This lack of clear separation can make it difficult for audiences to determine the factual status of individual stories or segments.


Opinion vs. News: The Blurred Lines

One of the most frequent critiques of Fox News, both on television and online, is the perceived blurring of the line between news reporting and commentary. While foxnews.com features dedicated sections for news and opinion, studies and user surveys referenced by media analysts suggest that some readers report confusion, especially when prominent TV hosts’ content appears alongside news articles without explicit labeling. This ambiguity can affect perceptions of reliability and has become a recurring point of concern in external evaluations.


Audience Trust & Reach: What Surveys Reveal

foxnews.com has one of the largest audiences of any news website, a testament to its broad reach and influence. According to Pew Research Center surveys, Fox News is among the most trusted news brands for U.S. conservatives—65% of conservative respondents express trust—while it is distrusted by 61% of liberals (Pew, 2020). These trust splits reflect Fox News’s prominent and sometimes contentious place in U.S. media, as well as divides in American political culture regarding the nature and purpose of journalism.


Synthesis: Balancing Plus & Minus Factors in foxnews.com Reliability

foxnews.com offers comprehensive news coverage and has significant reach within segments of the U.S. audience. It has published major scoops and breaking news stories and, for many, serves as a primary source of information. However, a record of fact-check failures, high-profile legal challenges, and critiques from independent watchdogs and academics are weighed in its overall reliability assessment.

NewsWall’s grading system weighs these plus and minus factors to provide a single, evidence-driven grade. Readers are encouraged to consider both the outlet’s strengths (broad coverage, engagement) and weaknesses (inconsistent fact-checking, blurred editorial boundaries) when evaluating its reporting.


Verdict: So, Is foxnews.com Reliable?

Based on the available evidence and external evaluations, foxnews.com has been the subject of frequent scrutiny from independent fact-checkers, media watchdogs, and legal proceedings. These sources have repeatedly raised concerns about the outlet’s standards for factual accuracy, editorial transparency, and correction practices. As a result, NewsWall assigns foxnews.com a F (insufficient).

Given this assessment, readers are advised to approach reporting from foxnews.com with particular caution, and to seek independent verification from multiple reputable sources before relying on its coverage for factual information.


FAQ — People Also Ask: “Is foxnews.com reliable?”

1. Is Fox News considered a credible news source?
Fox News is trusted by many U.S. conservatives, but media watchdogs and non-conservative audiences often rate it as “mixed” in credibility.

2. How biased is Fox News compared with other outlets?
Media analysts generally classify Fox News as “right-leaning” or “right bias,” with a combination of factual reporting and opinionated content.

3. Does Fox News separate opinion from news?
Fox News provides separate sections for news and opinion, but critics and some audience surveys referenced by analysts report confusion over labeling and distinction.

4. Has Fox News ever been sued for misinformation?
Yes. The network settled a $787.5 million defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems in 2023, and faces ongoing litigation from Smartmatic.

5. What is Fox News’ fact-checking record?
Fox News has been cited by independent fact-checkers for both accurate and inaccurate reporting; several high-profile claims have been found false.

6. Why do some viewers trust Fox News the most?
Many conservative viewers find Fox News aligns with their values and covers topics they feel are underrepresented elsewhere, which builds trust among that audience.

7. Are Fox News online articles more reliable than TV segments?
While foxnews.com has a dedicated digital team, analysts note that online and TV content often share sources and reporting standards.

8. What rating does Fox News get from MediaBiasFactCheck?
MBFC rates Fox News as “Right Bias” with “Mixed” factual reporting.

9. How does Fox News respond to correction requests?
Fox News maintains a corrections process; however, corrections may be less visible than at some peer outlets, based on media analyst reviews.

10. Where can I verify Fox News stories?
Use reputable fact-checking organizations (such as PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, or Reuters) and cross-reference with multiple established news sources.


Conclusion: Understanding the insufficient Grade for foxnews.com

While foxnews.com remains a highly visible and influential outlet, the body of evidence reviewed by NewsWall, including fact-checks, expert analyses, and relevant court findings, indicates a persistent pattern of reporting that has failed to meet widely recognized standards of accuracy and journalistic responsibility, according to multiple external sources. The insufficient grade reflects both the frequency and seriousness of these concerns as documented at the time of review.

For anyone seeking reliable, trustworthy news, it is strongly recommended to cross-check reporting from foxnews.com against sources with demonstrated editorial rigor and a consistent record of factual reporting. Media literacy and critical evaluation remain essential when engaging with content from this outlet.

Grade composition
The overall rating is made up of the following individual ratings from independent third parties:
Fact Checkers26 -
We primarily use fact-checkers affiliated with the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). We have linked to the International Fact-Checking Network fact-checkers' code of principles in the headline. For each failed fact-checker there is one minus point.
Media Bias/Fact Check6 +, 14 -
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American fact-checking website founded in 2015. It uses a 0-10 scale to rate sites on two areas: bias and factual accuracy. A source rated by MBFC with minimal bias gets 10 plus points. Maximum bias gets 10 minus points. The same principle applies to factual accuracy.
Ad Fontes Media6 +, 14 -
Ad Fontes Media, Inc. is a media watchdog organization based in Colorado that is best known for its Media Bias Chart, which ranks media sources based on political bias and reliability. We combine their ratings of individual articles and episodes to create a weighted average, with low-rated items increasingly weighted higher.
    Reliability (Weighted Average)
  • "Low"
Wikipedia2 +, 11 -
Wikipedia’s reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s. However, various studies and media reports have noted improvements over time, and in the late 2010s and early 2020s, it was more often praised. In the scoring model, any positive mention of a source’s credibility or quality in a Wikipedia extract receives a plus point—while negative mentions are treated as minus points.
Journalism Awards
Journalism prizes are awards for excellent journalistic work in the period covered by the call for entries, which is usually one or two years. Sources receive one plus point for each journalistic award won that we track. We currently track up to three prestigious awards per country.
  • We have not identified any awards for editorial or journalistic quality.
Press Council Rulings
Press councils are national institutions of media self-regulation. Press councils have their own defined press code. Reprimands are issued in the event of a violation of the press code (e.g. for truthfulness, diligence, sensationalism, separation of advertising and editorial, personal rights). For each reprimand issued by a national press council, a source receives one minus point.
  • We are not aware of any press council rulings against this source to date.
Studies
Most scientific publications, though not all, rely on some form of peer review or editorial review to qualify texts for publication. Sources mentioned in studies which rate media quality and/or reliability receive between 10 plus and 10 minus points.
  • We have not identified any evaluations by academic studies to date.
Are these sources reliable?
Profile picture of The New York Times
The New York Times
@nytimes.com
Profile picture of theguardian.com
theguardian.com
@theguardian.com
Profile picture of The Week
The Week
@theweek.com
Profile picture of economist.com
economist.com
@economist.com
Profile picture of apnews.com
apnews.com
@apnews.com
Profile picture of latimes.com
latimes.com
@latimes.com
Profile picture of Breitbart
Breitbart
@breitbart.com
Profile picture of washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
@washingtonpost.com
Profile picture of CNN
CNN
@cnn.com
News from reputable sources that might interest you
Key FactsObama’s Poised Reply to Trump’s Controversial Video
in 31 min · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: buzzfeed.com
  • A video shared on Trump’s Truth Social depicted the Obamas as apes, widely condemned as racist nationwide.

  • The Trump administration initially deflected blame before attributing the post to a staffer error.

  • Obama highlighted that the majority of Americans reject such provocations and still value decency and respect.

  • He noted the erosion of decorum in politics but expressed confidence that Americans will ultimately address the issue.
  • Well, first of all, I think it's important to recognize that the majority of the American people find this behavior deeply troubling.
    Barack Obama addressing the reaction to Donald Trump's racist post during an interview.
"Clown Show": Obama calls out MAGA over racist ape video of him and Michelle - Salon.com
salon.com/2026/02/15/clown-show-obama-calls-out-maga-over-racist-ape-video-of-him-and-michelle/
"Clown Show": Obama calls out MAGA over racist ape video of him ...
Key FactsObama Condemns Federal Actions and Racist Imagery
4 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: news.sky.com
  • Barack Obama responded to a racist video depicting him and Michelle Obama as apes without naming Donald Trump.

  • He criticized the decline of decorum and respect in US politics while Trump refused to apologize for sharing the video.

  • Obama condemned the deployment of 3,000 ICE agents in Minneapolis as reckless and likened their conduct to actions seen in dictatorships.

  • He praised the community’s strong response in Minnesota and stated that meaningful change must come from the American people.
  • The way that federal agents, ICE agents, were being deployed without any clear guidelines, training, pulling people out of their homes, using five-year-olds to try and bait their parents, all the stuff we saw… the rogue behaviour of agents of the federal government is deeply concerning.
    Barack Obama expressed concern over the actions of ICE agents in Minneapolis, comparing them to practices seen in dictatorships.
Pam Bondi is leaving her Democratic successor a mess: The Justice Department was reformed in the wake of Watergate. A similar process will be needed after ...
salon.com/2026/02/15/pam-bondi-is-leaving-her-democratic-successor-a-mess/
Pam Bondi is leaving her Democratic successor a mess
Key FactsJustice Department Faces Urgent Post-Bondi Overhaul
2 hours ago · Reading time: ~30 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: salon.com
  • Pam Bondi’s testimony revealed a flagrant disregard for legal norms, damaging the Justice Department’s credibility.

  • Post-Watergate reforms serve as a blueprint to shield the Justice Department from political interference and restore its autonomy.

  • A significant loss of experienced prosecutors and their replacement by loyalists have severely undermined the department’s effectiveness.

  • Future reforms must limit presidential powers and enhance protections for inspectors general, whistleblowers, and the press.
Barack Obama Says Aliens Are ‘Real,’ But They Aren’t Being Kept at Area 51: Obama also condemned ICE's actions in Minnesota and commented on a video posted by ...
time.com/7378768/obama-aliens-real-area-51/
Barack Obama Says Aliens Are ‘Real,’ But They Aren’t Being Kept at Area 51
Key FactsOrbán Targets EU Influence Ahead of Election
21 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: cnn.com
  • Orbán framed the EU as Hungary’s main threat, likening it to the former Soviet regime.

  • Fidesz trails the opposition Tisza party, which pledges to restore ties with Western allies.

  • Orbán opposes aid to Ukraine and maintains close ties to Russia despite EU sanctions on Hungary.

  • Endorsed by Donald Trump, Orbán vows to remove foreign influence if re-elected.
  • The Brussels repressive machine is still operating in Hungary. We’ll clean it up after April.
    Viktor Orbán, in a speech to supporters about the threat the EU poses to Hungary.
Key FactsMalinin's Olympic Collapse Shocks Figure Skating World
1 days ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: nytimes.com
  • Ilia Malinin, the world record-holder and heavy favorite, fell twice during the 2026 Olympic free skate and finished eighth.

  • He completed only three of seven planned quadruple jumps, scoring well below the 183.43 points needed for the gold medal.

  • Malinin cited overwhelming pressure and nerves as reasons for losing control during his Olympic performance.

  • Despite his individual setback, he contributed to the United States winning gold in the team figure skating event.
  • Honestly, I can’t understand what it was now.
    Ilia Malinin reflects on his performance at the Olympics.
Sober people being arrested nationwide for DUI. Show more
US demands rejected: Wadephul to Rubio: We don't need any more advice.: According to US Secretary of State Rubio, his country wants to continue to play a key ...
n-tv.de/politik/Wadephul-an-Rubio-Brauchen-keine-weiteren-Ratschlaege-id30363868.html
US demands rejected: Wadephul to Rubio: We don't need any more advice.
Key FactsRubio’s Ultimatum: Europe Must Reform or Be Abandoned
5 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: cnn.com
  • At the Munich Security Conference, Marco Rubio stated the US expects Europe to undergo a profound transformation beyond defense spending.

  • He emphasized returning to shared values such as Christianity and cultural heritage while abandoning climate policies and open borders.

  • Ukrainian President Zelensky highlighted his country's severe challenges and urged Europe to develop its own defense strategy.

  • European leaders face internal turmoil and budget constraints, complicating transatlantic cooperation amid ongoing political conflicts.
  • The US needs to see a reformed Europe, not just details of defense budgets, but a sea change in the continent’s value system.
    Marco Rubio, US Secretary of State, at the Munich Security Conference.
New poll says Bad Bunny represents America better than Donald Trump - after president’s Super Bowl rage
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/bad-bunny-trump-super-bowl-poll-b2920531.html
New poll says Bad Bunny represents America better than Donald Trump - ...
Key FactsBad Bunny and Trump: Divided Views on American Identity
21 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: merkur.de
  • A Yahoo and YouGov poll found 42% of respondents view Bad Bunny as a stronger representation of America compared to 39% for Donald Trump.

  • Reactions to Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime performance reveal sharp political divisions, with Democrats largely positive and Republicans mostly negative.

  • The halftime show attracted an average audience of 128.2 million at Levi’s Stadium and conveyed a message emphasizing love over hate.

  • Donald Trump harshly condemned the performance as an insult to America, while conservative politicians called for deportations.
  • The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love.
    — Bad Bunny, during his halftime show at the Super Bowl, regarding the message he conveyed.
Russian Opposition Leader Navalny Poisoned With Deadly ‘Dart Frog’ Toxin, European Governments Say
time.com/7378735/navalny-poison-frog-toxin-russia/
Russian Opposition Leader Navalny Poisoned With Deadly ‘Dart Frog’ Toxin ...
Key FactsNavalny Poisoned with Deadly Frog Neurotoxin
21 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: time.com
  • Five European governments verified the presence of the lethal neurotoxin epibatidine in Alexei Navalny’s body.

  • The findings strongly indicate poisoning, implicating the Russian state as the likely perpetrator.

  • Epibatidine is naturally found only in South American dart frogs and does not occur in Russia.

  • The case has been reported to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons for treaty violations.
  • Scientists from five European countries have established: my husband, Alexei Navalny, was poisoned with epibatidine—a neurotoxin, one of the deadliest poisons on earth. In nature, this poison can be found on the skin of the Ecuadorian dart frog. It causes paralysis, respiratory arrest, and a painful death.
    Yulia Navalnaya, at a press conference during the Munich Security Conference.
Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter-ID requirements before midterms
cnbc.com/2026/02/13/trump-congress-voter-id-midterms.html
Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter-ID requirements ...
Key FactsTrump to Enforce Nationwide Voter ID by Executive Order
1 days ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: cnbc.com
  • An executive order mandating national voter identification is expected from Trump soon.

  • The SAVE America Act, requiring proof of citizenship and photo ID, passed narrowly in the House.

  • The bill faces strong opposition in the Senate, lacking sufficient votes to overcome a filibuster.

  • Trump cautions that Democratic control could lead to court expansion and changes to Senate rules.
  • Our Country will never be the same if they allow these demented and evil people to knowingly, and happily, destroy it.
    Donald Trump spoke about the potential consequences of Democratic power in the upcoming elections.
ICE agents detain 5 men on their way to work at a southern Illinois sawmill: This marks one of the first reported mass ICE enforcement actions this far south in ...
stltoday.com/news/local/crime-courts/article_7781d193-0c9a-47b0-8ef2-7aba3e6bdca8.html
ICE agents detain 5 men on their way to work at a southern Illinois ...
Daughter whose dad fought detainment as she battled cancer dies: Ofelia Torres' story came to public attention after the teen's father was detained at a Home ...
chicagotribune.com/2026/02/14/chicago-teen-fought-cancer-dies/
Daughter whose dad fought detainment as she battled cancer dies
Right-wing media turns on Kash Patel over Nancy Guthrie case: The FBI director is also facing criticism over his handling of the Epstein files
salon.com/2026/02/14/right-wing-media-turns-on-kash-patel-over-nancy-guthrie-case/
Right-wing media turns on Kash Patel over Nancy Guthrie case
Key FactsKash Patel Faces Backlash Over FBI Failures
1 days ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: salon.com
  • Once hailed by MAGA supporters, Kash Patel is now widely criticized for mismanagement and premature announcements at the FBI.

  • The bureau lost significant expertise as 3,063 employees departed in 2025 under Patel's leadership.

  • The unresolved Nancy Guthrie abduction and false claims about suspects have further damaged Patel’s reputation in right-wing media.

  • Controversial testimony on Epstein and mishandling of related files have led to accusations of dishonesty and calls for Patel’s resignation.
  • Everyone in the world now knows that there was 100% a human trafficking operation where Jeffrey Epstein was procuring girls for wealthy and powerful people. Everybody knows that.
    — Conservative podcast host Tim Dillon dedicated a portion of his latest podcast to torching Patel as a 'big fat liar' and calling on him to resign.
ICE plans to spend $38.3B on new and expanded detention centers, boosting capacity to 92,600 beds by 2026, according to DHS documents ... Show more

LA Olympics leader Wasserman will sell talent agency in wake of Epstein emails discovery
DHS Set to Shut Down With No End In Sight Amid Impasse Over Immigration: The partial government shutdown starting this weekend is the second funding lapse in ...
time.com/7378601/government-shutdown-congress-ice-dhs-democrats-polls/
DHS Set to Shut Down With No End In Sight Amid Impasse Over Immigration