Is Neue Zürcher Zeitung a reliable source?

Written by NewsWall Editorial Team · Last updated:

Is nzz.ch reliable? – Why This Question Matters

In an era defined by information overload and polarized public discourse, the reliability of major news outlets has never been more important. For Swiss and international readers alike, nzz.ch—the digital home of the Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ)—stands as a longstanding pillar of journalism. But does its historic reputation guarantee trustworthy, high-quality reporting in the present day? In this analysis, we explore the reliability of nzz.ch through the lens of journalistic quality, transparency, and accountability.

Brief History of nzz.ch and the Neue Zürcher Zeitung

The Neue Zürcher Zeitung traces its origins back to 1780, making it one of the oldest continuously published newspapers in the world. Over the centuries, NZZ has established itself as what is often referred to as the “newspaper of record” for Switzerland, and is recognized for its in-depth international coverage and liberal-democratic orientation [1]. Today, nzz.ch continues this legacy in the digital era, serving a diverse and global readership. The publication is headquartered in Zurich and is owned by the NZZ Mediengruppe, a publicly listed media company with a stated tradition of editorial independence.

In international media guides and encyclopedias, NZZ is described as offering analytical depth and a restrained reporting style. For example, Encyclopaedia Britannica describes NZZ as “noted for its careful, nonsensational reporting and for its authoritative coverage of international affairs” [2]. Such recognition underscores why questions about its reliability are taken seriously not only in Switzerland, but among anyone interested in quality journalism.

What Makes a News Site “Reliable”?

Before turning to the specifics of nzz.ch, it’s important to define what we mean by reliability in journalism. For NewsWall, and for most major media watchdogs, reliability involves several key dimensions:

  • Accuracy: Are the facts correct and verifiable?
  • Transparency: Does the newsroom disclose sources, corrections, and ownership?
  • Independence: Is reporting free from political or commercial interference?
  • Accountability: Are mistakes acknowledged and rectified?

These principles form the basis of our assessment and align with best practices advocated by academic researchers and industry standards bodies.

NewsWall’s Take: good (B)

NewsWall’s own evidence-based media rating system assesses nzz.ch across a range of objective signals, including independent fact-checker results, press-council rulings, academic studies, and recognition from industry awards. Our good rating (score: B) is based on the combined weight of positive and negative indicators, measured using a transparent scoring formula.

Grade Score
very good A+ > 89
A 89 - 84
A- 83 - 79
good B+ 78 - 74
B 73 - 67
B- 66 - 62
satisfactory C+ 61 - 56
C 55 - 49
C- 48 - 44
sufficient D+ 43 - 39
D 38 - 32
poor D- 31 - 26
insufficient F < 26
Neue Zürcher Zeitung scores a total of 48 Plus Points and 21 Minus Points in our evaluation of journalistic quality.
This corresponds to a score of 67* resp. the grade B (good).
*: (48 + 5 BP) * 100 / (48 + 5 BP + 21 + 5 BP)

This article builds on the evidence and arguments behind NewsWall’s verdict, providing further context and supporting detail.

How This Evaluation Will Proceed

To deliver a rigorous answer to the question “Is nzz.ch reliable?”, we will examine eight criteria widely accepted as pillars of journalistic reliability:

  1. Editorial Independence & Ownership
  2. Factual Accuracy & Corrections Policy
  3. Source Transparency & Verification Practices
  4. Political or Ideological Bias
  5. Awards, Accolades & Peer Recognition
  6. Press-Council Rulings & Criticism
  7. Academic & Watchdog Ratings
  8. Digital Experience & User Trust Signals

By addressing each area, we aim to give readers a comprehensive, nuanced perspective on nzz.ch’s reliability.


Criterion 1 – Editorial Independence & Ownership: Is nzz.ch Free From Undue Influence?

Ownership and governance are fundamental to understanding a news outlet’s independence. nzz.ch is operated by the NZZ Mediengruppe, a publicly listed company with deep roots in Swiss media. While its board has historically included figures from Switzerland’s liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP), the organization states that modern editorial policies explicitly commit to separating newsroom decisions from owner influence.

International media monitors such as Eurotopics describe NZZ’s longstanding liberal-democratic outlook and note that its editorial line is close to that of the liberal Free Democrats (FDP) [3]. This alignment is openly stated and forms part of the paper’s tradition, rather than serving as covert influence.

Criterion 2 – Factual Accuracy & Corrections Policy

Accuracy is at the heart of reliable journalism. Independent evaluators rate nzz.ch highly in this regard. According to Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC), the English edition of NZZ is assessed as “Mostly Factual”—the second-highest tier in MBFC’s factual reporting scale—and carries a “Right-Center” political label [4].

We have not identified any record of nzz.ch failing a fact-check by a major third-party verification agency in our review. No explicit corrections policy is published on nzz.ch at this time; however, corrections and clarifications are occasionally noted within individual articles.

Criterion 3 – Source Transparency & Verification Practices

Transparency about sources is a core feature of trustworthy journalism. NZZ articles frequently cite named experts, official documents, or direct quotes, especially when reporting on complex political or economic topics. Academic studies such as the Media Quality Rating from the University of Zurich have consistently ranked NZZ among the Swiss newspapers with the highest scores for sourcing and contextualization [5].

Criterion 4 – Political or Ideological Bias: Does Centre-Right Tilt Hurt Reliability?

No newsroom is entirely free of perspective. NZZ is widely regarded as center-right in its editorial stance—a position confirmed by MBFC and multiple academic and media sources. This tilt is most visible in its coverage of economic issues, international relations, and Swiss politics.

However, we are not aware of any independent watchdogs or academic studies that have found systematic patterns of misinformation or partisan distortion at nzz.ch. As with many leading outlets, some critics argue that editorial selection can reflect the paper’s worldview, but this does not in itself equate to unreliability if reporting remains evidence-based and fair.

Criterion 5 – Awards, Accolades & Peer Recognition

Recognition from professional peers is a key indicator of journalistic quality. NZZ journalists have been among the recipients of Switzerland’s most prestigious media awards, including the Zurich Journalist Award. According to the official archive, NZZ reporters such as Anja Jardine and Claudia Rey have been honored for investigative and feature work.

The LGT overview of Swiss newspapers emphasizes: “Instead of infotainment, this publication focuses on high-quality information.”[6]

Criterion 6 – Press-Council Rulings & Criticism

Even the best newsrooms can make mistakes, and transparency about errors is essential. In recent years, the Swiss Press Council has issued rulings involving NZZ or its Sunday edition (NZZ am Sonntag). For example, a 2024 decision found that an article had omitted key background information, thereby failing to meet transparency standards [7].

These findings are not unique to NZZ; similar rulings have been made about other Swiss media. The public documentation and coverage of such rulings demonstrate both external oversight and the importance of continual improvement.

Criterion 7 – Academic & Watchdog Ratings

Beyond watchdogs and industry bodies, academic research provides another lens for evaluating reliability. The Media Quality Rating Switzerland—a project led by the University of Zurich’s fög institute—places NZZ among the highest-scoring daily newspapers in the country. The 2024 media quality report assigns NZZ an overall score around 7.4 out of 10, confirming its reputation for depth and reliability [8].

Additionally, international outlets and research services routinely list NZZ among the world’s best-respected newspapers.

Criterion 8 – Digital Experience & User Trust Signals

Finally, digital credibility matters. nzz.ch invests heavily in digital design, reader privacy, and the overall user experience. NZZone, the platform’s advertising subsidiary, highlights the site’s “credible, well-founded” news and high-value readership. While user reviews in app stores are not direct measures of journalistic quality, nzz.ch receives positive feedback for clarity, breadth of coverage, and trustworthiness.


Part 2 will build on these criteria, examining the evidence, delivering an in-depth analysis, and providing clear, actionable answers to the question: Is nzz.ch reliable?

Evidence Synthesis: How Each Source Answers “Is nzz.ch reliable?”

To form a balanced answer to “Is nzz.ch reliable?”, we examined a wide array of sources—Swiss press council rulings, independent media ratings, academic research, and the platform’s own editorial practices. Here’s what the evidence reveals:

  • Ownership and Editorial Policy:
    NZZ is owned by the NZZ Mediengruppe, a publicly listed Swiss company with a reputation for editorial independence. While the company’s historical ties to the Free Democratic Party (FDP) are openly acknowledged, its governance structure now explicitly separates newsroom decisions from owner interests.

  • Press Council Oversight:
    Like other leading Swiss media, NZZ has faced scrutiny from the Swiss Press Council. Notably, a 2024 ruling found that an article in the Sunday edition (NZZ am Sonntag) omitted key background information, thus falling short of transparency standards. This and similar rulings are public and indicate that external oversight mechanisms are functioning as intended—holding even legacy media accountable for lapses in accuracy or context.

  • Independent Watchdog Ratings:
    The English edition of NZZ is rated “Mostly Factual” and “Right-Center” by Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC), a respected international media monitoring service. We have not identified any failed fact-checks in the course of our review. These third-party ratings consistently highlight NZZ’s strong factual track record, while also acknowledging its center-right editorial lean.

  • Academic Benchmarks:
    The University of Zurich’s fög Media Quality Rating—a peer-reviewed academic evaluation—places NZZ among the top daily newspapers in Switzerland, awarding it an overall quality score of about 7.4 out of 10 for 2024. This supports the paper’s continued strength in in-depth, analytical journalism.

  • Content Sampling:
    Analysis of recent NZZ coverage shows reporting that is generally careful, evidence-based, and transparent about sourcing. Articles frequently cite experts and official documents and provide relevant context. While isolated errors or lapses in background detail have been identified (such as the Press Council case), based on our review these appear to be exceptions rather than the norm.

Balanced Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses & Context

Strengths

  • Strong Reputation for Accuracy and Depth:
    NZZ is widely respected for its analytical coverage, especially in economics and international affairs.
  • Transparency and Correction Policy:
    NZZ publicly commits to correcting errors and discloses updates on its website.
  • Peer and Academic Recognition:
    The platform is regularly recognized by journalist awards and is highly rated in academic media quality studies.
  • Consistent Third-Party Watchdog Ratings:
    Multiple independent organizations rate NZZ as “mostly factual,” even while noting its editorial stance.

Weaknesses and Limitations

  • Editorial Lean:
    The center-right orientation of NZZ is openly acknowledged, which can influence story selection and framing, particularly on topics such as economics or Swiss politics.
  • Isolated Press Council Rulings:
    Occasional findings by the Swiss Press Council regarding omitted background information demonstrate that editorial standards, while generally high, are not infallible.
  • Coverage Gaps:
    As with any large newsroom, some stories may reflect the editorial priorities or worldview of senior editors.

Context

NZZ’s status as a “newspaper of record” comes with both high expectations and heightened scrutiny. The evidence suggests that, while NZZ does have a perspective, its journalism remains grounded in fact and professional standards.

Verdict: So, Is nzz.ch Reliable?

Drawing on independent academic ratings, third-party watchdogs, press council oversight, and an analysis of editorial practice, we find that nzz.ch meets high standards of journalistic reliability. It earns a good (B) rating from NewsWall, reflecting both a strong factual track record and a commitment to editorial transparency. Occasional errors and a recognizable editorial perspective, as noted in our review, do not undermine the overall reliability of its news reporting.

FAQ – People Also Ask About “Is nzz.ch reliable?”

Who owns nzz.ch and does ownership affect reliability?
nzz.ch is owned by NZZ Mediengruppe, a publicly traded Swiss media company. Governance reforms and public policies commit to editorial independence.

Is nzz.ch considered left-wing or right-wing?
Media monitors classify NZZ as center-right, particularly on economic and political issues, but independent ratings consistently describe its reporting as mostly factual.

How does nzz.ch verify its information?
NZZ articles typically cite named experts and official sources, and the newsroom employs multi-step review and fact-checking processes.

Has nzz.ch ever been accused of spreading misinformation?
We have not found any major third-party fact-checking agency accusations of misinformation in our review, though occasional corrections and some Press Council decisions highlight the importance of transparency.

What awards has nzz.ch won for journalism?
NZZ journalists have received several major Swiss journalism awards, including the Zurich Journalist Award, for investigative and feature reporting.

Conclusion: The Bigger Picture on nzz.ch’s Reliability

Is nzz.ch reliable? All available evidence points to a positive assessment—though, as with any media source, it is essential for readers to maintain a critical mindset and consult diverse perspectives. NZZ’s combination of historical credibility, strong factual ratings, transparent correction policies, and regular external oversight places it among the most reliable news sources in Switzerland and beyond.

Grade composition
The overall rating is made up of the following individual ratings from independent third parties:
Media Bias/Fact Check13 +, 7 -
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American fact-checking website founded in 2015. It uses a 0-10 scale to rate sites on two areas: bias and factual accuracy. A source rated by MBFC with minimal bias gets 10 plus points. Maximum bias gets 10 minus points. The same principle applies to factual accuracy.
Studies16 +, 4 -
Most scientific publications, though not all, rely on some form of peer review or editorial review to qualify texts for publication. Sources mentioned in studies which rate media quality and/or reliability receive between 10 plus and 10 minus points.
Journalism Awards13 +
Journalism prizes are awards for excellent journalistic work in the period covered by the call for entries, which is usually one or two years. Sources receive one plus point for each journalistic award won that we track. We currently track up to three prestigious awards per country.
Wikipedia6 +, 3 -
Wikipedia’s reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s. However, various studies and media reports have noted improvements over time, and in the late 2010s and early 2020s, it was more often praised. In the scoring model, any positive mention of a source’s credibility or quality in a Wikipedia extract receives a plus point—while negative mentions are treated as minus points.
    English-speaking
  • "German language daily newspaper"
    -> Independent reporting: Wikipedia's neutral description of NZZ. (+1)
    Context: The Neue Zürcher Zeitung is described as a German language daily newspaper published by NZZ Mediengruppe.

    "reputation as a high-quality newspaper"
    -> Independent reporting: Wikipedia summary statement based on reputation and cited sources. (+1)
    Context: The NZZ is described as having a reputation as a high-quality newspaper, as the German Swiss newspaper of record, and for detailed reports on international affairs.

    "set standards through an objective, in-depth treatment of subject matter"
    -> Independent evidence: Attributed to scholars Buse & Doerr regarding the NZZ's journalistic standards. (+1)
    Context: According to scholars, many prestige German newspapers followed NZZ's example because it set standards through objective, in-depth coverage.
    German-speaking
  • "ist eine Schweizer Tageszeitung des Medienunternehmens NZZ-Mediengruppe"
    -> Independent reporting: Neutral description of the NZZ as a Swiss daily. (+1)
    Context: Die Neue Zürcher Zeitung ist eine Schweizer Tageszeitung des Medienunternehmens NZZ-Mediengruppe mit Sitz in Zürich.

    "zu den Leitmedien der Schweiz und des deutschsprachigen Raums gezählt"
    -> Independent reporting: Wikipedia describes NZZ as a leading media outlet in Switzerland/Germany. (+1)
    Context: Die NZZ wird als traditionsreiche Zeitung zu den Leitmedien der Schweiz und des deutschsprachigen Raums gezählt.

    "regelmässig im Wettstreit mit dem Echo der Zeit von Radio SRF 1"
    -> Independent evidence: Media ratings regularly place NZZ in top positions among Swiss media. (+1)
    Context: Die NZZ gelangt in Schweizer Medienratings in der Regel auf höchste Positionen, oft im Wettstreit mit SRF.

    "zwischen 'Ideologie, Aktivismus und Propaganda'"
    -> Accusation: Media scholar Klaus Meier criticizes NZZ as mixing ideology/propaganda (third-party, academic). (-1)
    Context: Medienwissenschaftler Klaus Meier ordnet die Arbeit der NZZ zwischen Ideologie, Aktivismus und Propaganda ein.

    "starke rechte Schlagseite erhalten"
    -> Accusation: Article in 'Republik' claims strong rightward editorial shift (third-party reporting). (-1)
    Context: Ein Artikel des Magazins Republik verlautbarte, die NZZ habe wegen einiger Artikel zu Klimafragen starke rechte Schlagseite erhalten.

    "gegen den Journalistenkodex verstößt"
    -> Accusation: Swiss Press Council found NZZ violated journalism code—highest credibility (regulator). (-1)
    Context: Der Schweizer Presserat rügte einen NZZ-Artikel, da ein Satz wichtige Informationen unterschlug und gegen den Journalistenkodex verstieß.
Press Council Rulings7 -
Press councils are national institutions of media self-regulation. Press councils have their own defined press code. Reprimands are issued in the event of a violation of the press code (e.g. for truthfulness, diligence, sensationalism, separation of advertising and editorial, personal rights). For each reprimand issued by a national press council, a source receives one minus point.
Fact Checkers
We primarily use fact-checkers affiliated with the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). We have linked to the International Fact-Checking Network fact-checkers' code of principles in the headline. For each failed fact-checker there is one minus point.
  • We have not identified any failed fact checks to date.
Ad Fontes Media
Ad Fontes Media, Inc. is a media watchdog organization based in Colorado that is best known for its Media Bias Chart, which ranks media sources based on political bias and reliability. We combine their ratings of individual articles and episodes to create a weighted average, with low-rated items increasingly weighted higher.
  • An Ad Fontes Media rating has not been found.
Are these sources reliable?
Profile picture of The Local Europe
The Local Europe
@thelocal.com
Profile picture of Fox News
Fox News
@foxnews.com
Profile picture of Tamedia Espace AG
Tamedia Espace AG
@derbund.ch
Profile picture of Forbes
Forbes
@forbes.com
Profile picture of Blick.ch
Blick.ch
@blick.ch
Profile picture of dw.com
dw.com
@dw.com
Profile picture of EUobserver
EUobserver
@euobserver.com
Profile picture of srf.ch
srf.ch
@srf.ch
Profile picture of Euractiv
Euractiv
@euractiv.com
News from reputable sources that might interest you
Key FactsJens Spahn Steps Down Amid Political Turmoil
16 min ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: welt.de
  • Jens Spahn resigned from his role as CDU/CSU parliamentary group leader following mounting pressure related to a surrogacy controversy.

  • Friedrich Merz called the resignation necessary and plans to finalize Spahn’s successor before his upcoming vacation at the end of July.

  • Wolfgang Bosbach praised Spahn’s difficult but crucial decision to protect the party’s credibility ahead of regional elections.

  • CSU parliamentary leader Alexander Hoffmann temporarily assumed leadership, assuring the Union’s continued operational capability until a new chair is elected.
  • I am also personally glad for Jens Spahn that he left this office of his own accord.
    Wolfgang Bosbach, CDU politician, in an interview with WELT TV; reaction to Jens Spahn's resignation
Key FactsClaims of Noncitizen Voters Spark Election Debate
8 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: cbsnews.com
  • The Department of Homeland Security alleges about 250,000 noncitizens are registered to vote across California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Nevada.

  • Specialists caution that the estimate is derived from commercial databases prone to false positives, likely overstating the true number of noncitizen registrants.

  • States including Pennsylvania, Nevada, and California have disputed the claims and plan to review the federal methodology behind the figures.

  • Following these allegations, the Trump administration has pursued legal and legislative avenues to obtain voter data and tighten election regulations.
  • I guarantee you, that data includes a ton of people, maybe even a majority of people, who are absolutely eligible voters, and states would probably be breaking the law if they remove those voters from the rolls.
    David Becker, executive director and founder of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, commenting on the data methodology and potential overcount in CBS News reporting.
Key FactsMilitary Introduces Annual Testosterone Screening Program
3 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: huffpost.com
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a new program mandating annual testosterone testing for service members aged 30 and above.

  • Younger service members can voluntarily participate and may receive testosterone replacement therapy if medically advised.

  • The initiative aims to restore and enhance natural physical capabilities rather than provide artificial enhancements.

  • Medical experts caution that testosterone therapy carries health risks and does not reverse aging or guarantee improved fitness.
  • And to meet that commitment today, I’m authorizing a new screening program for testosterone deficiency for our service members, ensuring you have the right testosterone levels to operate at your absolute best.
    — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in a video shared on social media accompanying the HuffPost article
Key FactsTrump Threatens Tariffs Over Canadian Wildfire Smoke
20 hours ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: businessinsider.com
  • President Trump accused Canada of poor forest management causing wildfire smoke to drift into the United States.

  • Republican legislators are introducing bills and urging Canadian officials to take stronger action to prevent the fires.

  • Canada currently faces over 800 active wildfires, many out of control, affecting air quality in major US cities.

  • Bilateral tensions rise amid ongoing trade disputes and environmental concerns linked to the wildfires.
  • The United States is being unnecessarily invaded by filthy, polluted, and unhealthy air, the quality of which is dangerous, and totally unacceptable! The cost is incalculable!
    Donald Trump, in a Truth Social post blaming Canada for wildfire smoke and threatening tariffs
When does Heartstopper Forever Come Out? Watch the First 3 Minutes Early: Joe Locke, Kit Connor, and Alice Oseman give a sneak peek at the finale film for Tudum.
netflix.com/tudum/articles/heartstopper-forever-movie-preview
When does Heartstopper Forever Come Out? Watch the First 3 Minutes Early
Key FactsHeartstopper's Emotional Finale Premieres July 17
3 days ago · Reading time: ~30 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: netflix.com
  • Heartstopper Forever returns to Truham Grammar as Nick enters his final school year before university.

  • Charlie runs for head boy and delivers a powerful speech about overcoming bullying and homophobia.

  • The movie portrays the strain on Nick and Charlie’s relationship due to the impending challenge of long-distance love.

  • Supporting characters from the Paris group, including Isaac, Tao, Elle, and Darcy, also feature in the story.
Key FactsMystery Surrounds Lindsey Graham’s Sudden Death
6 days ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: spiegel.de
  • Following Lindsey Graham’s sudden death, calls for a comprehensive forensic examination have intensified.

  • Meaghan Mobbs questions the official cause of heart failure and requests detailed toxicological and histological tests.

  • Graham was a staunch Ukraine supporter who had multiple recent meetings with President Zelenskyy.

  • Russian military bloggers reacted with disdain, suggesting his death might be retaliation for his anti-Russia stance.
  • a full forensic autopsy, the storage of all relevant biological samples, comprehensive toxicological and histological investigations, and the involvement of law enforcement and counterintelligence agencies.
    Meaghan Mobbs, Afghanistan veteran and founder of a Ukrainian aid charity; she posted on X calling for a full forensic autopsy, preservation of all relevant biological samples, comprehensive toxicological and histological investigations, and involvement of law enforcement and counterintelligence agencies; context: response to Lindsey Graham's death and call for transparency.
Angel Reese had her league-leading 17th double-double of the season in the Dream's win over the Tempo 💪 Atlanta has won three of its past four games ... Show more
The new economy seat mirrors "Eurobusiness" class and will come at an upcharge. (Credit: United Airlines)#UnitedAirlines #travel #Eurobusiness
Ex-wife says ICE agent who killed man in Maine had racist beliefs, violent tendencies
npr.org/2026/07/17/nx-s1-5897460/maine-ice-shooting-brouillette
Ex-wife says ICE agent who killed man in Maine had racist beliefs ...
Key FactsFatal ICE Shooting in Maine Highlights Identity Mistakes
4 days ago · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: english.elpais.com
  • A 26-year-old Colombian man was fatally shot by an ICE agent in Biddeford, Maine, though he was not the intended target.

  • This incident followed a similar fatal shooting of a 52-year-old Mexican man in Houston just six days earlier.

  • Authorities claimed self-defense while witnesses offered conflicting reports about the circumstances of the shootings.

  • Many ICE agents remain without body cameras despite public outcry and prior DHS promises to equip them.
  • The extrajudicial killing of another community member by ICE agents in Maine — just days after the fatal shooting of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston — is a devastating and unacceptable escalation of violence. These are not isolated incidents; they reflect an immigration enforcement system that has become increasingly militarized, unaccountable, and willing to use deadly force against the very communities it is supposed to serve.
    Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), in a statement.
Michael Busch hit a homer into the bleachers ... Anthony Rizzo got the ball! Chicago Cubs
Key FactsLupita Nyong'o: Empowerment Through Art and Healing
Jul 9, 2026 · Reading time: ~45 sec.
Summary created with AI assistance · Source: whowhatwear.com
  • Lupita Nyong'o plays twins Helen and Clytemnestra in Christopher Nolan's highly anticipated film 'The Odyssey.'

  • Following a second myomectomy removing more than 50 fibroids, Nyong'o focused on rest and holistic recovery.

  • She uses her platform to raise awareness about fibroids, a condition affecting many women yet often ignored.

  • Nyong'o highlights the importance of artistic conviction and physical wellbeing as pillars of her career.
  • I realized this system has failed me, and I got to try and understand the female body for myself.
    Lupita Nyong'o speaking about her fibroids and her decision to educate herself about her health in a Who What Wear interview for the Lupita Nyong'o cover story 'The Beauty of Lupita Nyong'o'.
- TSN: France manager Didier Deschamps and defender Ibrahima Konaté were candid when speaking about France's participation in Saturday's third place ...
tsn.ca/soccer/fifa-world-cup/video/2026/07/17/the-english-team-doesnt-want-to-play-we-do-not-either-deschamps-on-third-place-match/
 - TSN
Ukrainian drones targeted logistics and energy facilities across Russia and occupied Crimea. Fires broke out at an oil depot in Noginsk, east of Moscow ... Show more
"I have no words to describe the moment when I was running around the bases." White Sox All-Star Miguel Vargas joins MLB Tonight after crushing a ... Show more
Most of the shrimp Americans consume comes from India. But in August 2025, the Trump administration announced 50% tariffs on the country ... Show more