arXiv Is Rate Limiting Submissions Because It Can’t Keep up With AI Slop: The academic publisher said submissions have doubled in the past two years and ...
404media.co/arxiv-is-rate-limiting-submissions-because-it-cant-keep-up-with-ai-slop/
arXiv Is Rate Limiting Submissions Because It Can’t Keep up With AI Slop
Similar to This
Competition for attention predicts good-to-bad tipping in AI: When will your AI chat app—or your child’s, a doctor’s, a lawyer’s, or a soldier’s—tip unnoticed ...
cell.com/patterns/abstract/S2666-3899(26)00175-3
Competition for attention predicts good-to-bad tipping in AI
Due to AI paper flood: Arxiv limits authors to two papers per month - | Golem.de: The number of submissions to Arxiv has increased rapidly due to AI ...
golem.de/news/wegen-ki-paper-flut-arxiv-beschraenkt-autoren-auf-zwei-papers-pro-monat-2610-213661.html
Due to AI paper flood: Arxiv limits authors to two papers per month - | ...
Today's downloads predict tomorrow's scientific impact—up to five years out
techxplore.com/news/2026-08-today-downloads-tomorrow-scientific-impact.html
Today's downloads predict tomorrow's scientific impact—up to ...
Whoops! Most arXiv papers contain information never meant to be shared: Passwords, GPS coordinates and private conversations have all been found in the metadata ...
nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02057-8
Whoops! Most arXiv papers contain information never meant to be shared
Academics in Meltdown Now That They’re Responsible for AI Hallucinations in Their Research Papers
futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/academics-meltdown-ai-hallucinations-research
Academics in Meltdown Now That They’re Responsible for AI Hallucinations ...
GitHub - Teycir/ArxivExplorer: AI-enhanced semantic search engine for arXiv research papers.
github.com/Teycir/ArxivExplorer
GitHub - Teycir/ArxivExplorer: AI-enhanced semantic search engine for ...
Academics in Meltdown Now That They’re Responsible for AI Hallucinations in Their Research Papers
futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/academics-meltdown-ai-hallucinations-research
Academics in Meltdown Now That They’re Responsible for AI Hallucinations ...
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban: The preprint server is the latest to impose stiff penalties on authors who contribute to AI ‘slop’ ...
nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01595-5
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban
ArXiv Will Block Researchers for a Year If They Use AI to Write Their Papers: Mods will consider papers untrustworthy if they find clear evidence that the ...
extremetech.com/computing/arxiv-will-block-researchers-for-a-year-if-they-use-ai-to-write-their-papers
ArXiv Will Block Researchers for a Year If They Use AI to Write Their ...
A popular academic journal is coming down hard on AI-generated submissions: ArXiv will be issuing one-year bans to authors caught submitting AI work.
mashable.com/article/academic-journal-arxiv-issues-one-year-ban-for-ai-generated-submissons
A popular academic journal is coming down hard on AI-generated submissions
GitHub - mrapplexz/arxiv-at-home: Mom, we have arXiv at home! Self-hosted search engine for academic papers
github.com/mrapplexz/arxiv-at-home
GitHub - mrapplexz/arxiv-at-home: Mom, we have arXiv at home! Self-hosted ...
Training AI Co-Scientists Using Rubric Rewards: View recent discussion. Abstract: AI co-scientists are emerging as a tool to assist human researchers in ...
alphaxiv.org/abs/2512.23707
Training AI Co-Scientists Using Rubric Rewards
arXiv changes rules - | AI studies between pre-prints: arXiv.org must defend itself against AI slop and fake studies. In the future, review articles and position ...
heise.de/news/arXiv-aendert-Regeln-KI-Studien-zwischen-Pre-Prints-11041018.html
arXiv changes rules - | AI studies between pre-prints
'Positive review only': Researchers hide AI prompts in papers: TOKYO -- Research papers from 14 academic institutions in eight countries -- including Japan ...
asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Artificial-intelligence/Positive-review-only-Researchers-hide-AI-prompts-in-papers
'Positive review only': Researchers hide AI prompts in papers